MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2884648237 · doi:10.7202/1048598ar

Bestioles néfastes, prédateurs supportables et alliés susceptibles

2018· article· fr· W2884648237 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueRecherches amérindiennes au Québec · 2018
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicInsect Utilization and Effects
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesGeographyPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article décrit et analyse les représentations et pratiques, concernant les « petites bêtes » ( okuiltsitsin ), du peuple maseual (nahua) de la région de Cuetzalan, dans la Sierra Nororiental de Puebla, au Mexique. Il se fonde sur une vaste enquête de terrain sur les savoirs zoologiques amérindiens, réalisée en collaboration avec le Taller de Tradición Oral Totamachilis. En plus d’être classés selon un critère morphologique qui distingue les insectes, les arachnides et les gastéropodes, les petits êtres sont rangés en fonction de leur proximité avec la société humaine, qui souvent correspond avec les bienfaits matériels et spirituels qu’ils apportent : à un extrême, on trouve la prédation pure, sans contrepartie ; à l’autre, la réciprocité va même jusqu’à un « partage d’essence » avec l’insecte de prédilection, l’abeille autochtone ( Scaptotrigona mexicana ). Les représentations entomologiques ont largement recours à la métaphore et à la métonymie.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.586
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.088
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it