MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2884945743 · doi:10.1017/jpr.2018.33

General drawdown-based de Finetti optimization for spectrally negative Lévy risk processes

2018· article· en· W2884945743 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Probability · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicProbability and Risk Models
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsDrawdown (hydrology)DividendMathematicsLévy processPoisson distributionClass (philosophy)Mathematical economicsValue (mathematics)EconometricsApplied mathematicsMathematical optimizationEconomicsStatisticsComputer scienceGeologyFinance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract For spectrally negative Lévy risk processes we consider a general version of de Finetti's optimal dividend problem in which the ruin time is replaced with a general drawdown time from the running maximum in its value function. We identify a condition under which a barrier dividend strategy is optimal among all admissible strategies if the underlying process does not belong to a small class of compound Poisson processes with drift, for which the take-the-money-and-run dividend strategy is optimal. It generalizes the previous results on dividend optimization from ruin time based to drawdown time based. The associated drawdown functions are discussed in detail for examples of spectrally negative Lévy processes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.791
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it