Robust tracking of multiple objects in video by adaptive fusion of subband particle filters
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tracking of moving objects in video sequences is an important research problem because of its many industrial, biomedical, and security applications. Significant progress has been made on this topic in the last few decades. However, the ability to track objects accurately in video sequences that have challenging conditions and unexpected events, e.g. background motion and shadows; objects with different sizes and contrasts; a sudden change in illumination; partial object camouflage; and low signal‐to‐noise ratio, remains an important research problem. To address such difficulties, the authors developed a robust multiscale visual tracker that represents a captured video frame as different subbands in the wavelet domain. It then applies N independent particle filters to a small subset of these subbands, where the choice of this subset of wavelet subbands changes with each captured frame. Finally, it fuses the outputs of these N independent particle filters to obtain final position tracks of multiple moving objects in the video sequence. To demonstrate the robustness of their multiscale visual tracker, they applied it to four example videos that exhibit different challenges. Compared to a standard full‐resolution particle filter‐based tracker and a single wavelet subband (LL) 2 ‐based tracker, their multiscale tracker demonstrates significantly better tracking performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".