Functional Nonlinear Model Predictive Control Based on Adaptive Dynamic Programming
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents a functional model predictive control (MPC) approach based on an adaptive dynamic programming (ADP) algorithm with the abilities of handling control constraints and disturbances for the optimal control of nonlinear discrete-time systems. In the proposed ADP-based nonlinear MPC (NMPC) structure, a neural-network-based identification is established first to reconstruct the unknown system dynamics. Then, the actor-critic scheme is adopted with a critic network to estimate the index performance function and an action network to approximate the optimal control input. Meanwhile, as the MPC strategy can effectively determine the current control by solving a finite horizon open-loop optimal control problem, in the proposed algorithm, the infinite horizon is decomposed into a series of finite horizons to obtain the optimal control. In each finite horizon, the finite ADP algorithm solves the optimal control problem subject to the terminal constraint, the control constraint, and the disturbance. The uniform ultimate boundedness of the closed-loop system is verified by the Lyapunov approach. Finally, the ADP-based NMPC is conducted on two different cases and the simulation results demonstrate the quick response and strong robustness of the proposed method.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".