MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2886496632 · doi:10.1109/msp.2018.2868137

Sub-Nyquist Radar Systems: Temporal, Spectral, and Spatial Compression

2018· article· en· W2886496632 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Signal Processing Magazine · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadar Systems and Signal Processing
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersH2020 European Research CouncilAzrieli FoundationIsrael Science Foundation
KeywordsComputer scienceRadarRadar imaging3D radarContinuous-wave radarNyquist–Shannon sampling theoremRadar lock-onRadar engineering detailsFire-control radarBistatic radarRadar trackerRemote sensingMan-portable radarReal-time computingComputer visionTelecommunicationsGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Radar is an acronym for "radio detection and ranging." However, the functions of today's radar systems, both in civilian and military applications, go beyond simple target detection and localization; they extend to tracking, imaging, classification, and more and involve different types of radar systems, such as through-the-wall [1], ground-penetration [2], automotive [3], and weather [4]. Although radar technology has been well established for decades, a new line of compressed radars has recently emerged. These aim at reducing the complexity of classic radar systems by exploiting inherent prior information on the structure of the received signal from the targets. The goal of this article is to review these novel sub-Nyquist radars and their potential applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.830
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it