MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2886496632 · doi:10.1109/msp.2018.2868137

Sub-Nyquist Radar Systems: Temporal, Spectral, and Spatial Compression

2018· article· en· W2886496632 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Déborah Cohen, Yonina C. Eldar

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Signal Processing Magazine · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadar Systems and Signal Processing
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersH2020 European Research CouncilAzrieli FoundationIsrael Science Foundation
KeywordsComputer scienceRadarRadar imaging3D radarContinuous-wave radarNyquist–Shannon sampling theoremRadar lock-onRadar engineering detailsFire-control radarBistatic radarRadar trackerRemote sensingMan-portable radarReal-time computingComputer visionTelecommunicationsGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Radar is an acronym for "radio detection and ranging." However, the functions of today's radar systems, both in civilian and military applications, go beyond simple target detection and localization; they extend to tracking, imaging, classification, and more and involve different types of radar systems, such as through-the-wall [1], ground-penetration [2], automotive [3], and weather [4]. Although radar technology has been well established for decades, a new line of compressed radars has recently emerged. These aim at reducing the complexity of classic radar systems by exploiting inherent prior information on the structure of the received signal from the targets. The goal of this article is to review these novel sub-Nyquist radars and their potential applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations74
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Signal Processing MagazineSame topicRadar Systems and Signal ProcessingFrench-language works237,207