MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2886867729 · doi:10.23919/acc.2018.8431012

Asymptotic Performance of Energy-Aware Multiserver Queueing Systems with Setup Times

2018· article· en· W2886867729 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicAdvanced Queuing Theory Analysis
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsServerComputer scienceQueueQueueing theoryInfinityFunction (biology)Energy (signal processing)Mathematical optimizationComputer networkDistributed computingReal-time computingMathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Energy demands of modern datacentres are an immense concern. An intuitive solution is to turn servers off to incur less costs. However, the control problem of when to turn a specific server off, and when to then turn that server back on, is far from trivial. As such, many different authors have modeled this problem as an M/M/C queue where each server can be turned on, with an exponentially distributed setup time, or turned off instantaneously. We analyse this well-established model under the asymptotic regime where the number of servers approaches infinity while the load per server remains fixed and show that not only are many of the control policies in the literature equivalent under this regime, but they are also optimal under any cost function which is non-decreasing in the expected energy cost and response time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.885
Threshold uncertainty score0.545

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Queuing Theory AnalysisFrench-language works237,207