MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2888136048 · doi:10.1145/3233547.3233717

Choosing Non-redundant Representative Subsets Of Protein Sequence Data Sets Using Submodular Optimization

2018· article· en· W2888136048 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComplexity and Algorithms in Graphs
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubmodular set functionComputer scienceOptimization problemDisjoint setsSelection (genetic algorithm)Data miningSequence (biology)Redundancy (engineering)PreprocessorSet (abstract data type)MathematicsAlgorithmMathematical optimizationArtificial intelligenceBiologyCombinatorics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Selecting a non-redundant representative subset of sequences is a common step in many bioinformatics workflows, such as the creation of non-redundant training sets for sequence and structural models or selection of "operational taxonomic units" from metagenomics data. A representative subset is a subset of sequences from the original data set that (1) minimizes the redundancy in the representative sequences, and (2) maximizes the representativeness of the subset; that is, every sequence in the full data set has at least one representative that is similar to it. The selected representative subset is then used in downstream analysis in place of the full data set. Previous methods for this task, such as CD-HIT, PISCES and UCLUST, apply a heuristic threshold-based algorithm that has no theoretical guarantees. These sequence selection methods are very widely used---for example, the CD-HIT papers have been cited a total of >3,000 times (Google Scholar)---and are a standard preprocessing step applied to data sets of protein sequences, cDNA sequences and microbial DNA. In this work, we propose a principled framework, Repset, for representative protein sequence subset selection using submodular optimization. Submodular optimization, a discrete analogue to continuous convex optimization, has been used with great success for other representative set selection problems. Our approach involves defining a submodular objective function that quantifies the desirable properties of a given subset of sequences, and then applying a submodular optimization algorithm to choose a representative subset that maximizes this function. Framing this task as an optimization problem has two benefits. First, it allows us to leverage a large existing literature on submodular optimization. This led to the development of a method that is computationally efficient, empirically outperforms other methods, and, in contrast to all existing solutions to this problem, is backed by theoretical guarantees of its performance. In particular, Repset outperforms threshold-based methods on two measures: (1) representative subsets produced by Repset have lower redundancy, as measured by the pairwise similarity of sequences in the set, and (2) these subsets have greater structural diversity, as measured using the SCOPe library of protein domain structures. Second, the optimization-based framework gives the method great flexibility. The user can select one of a variety of objective functions to optimize according to their needs. For example, the user can minimize the redundancy of sequences in the subset, maximize the representativeness of the subset of the full set, or some combination of the two. The user can also choose to prefer some sequences over others, such as preferring long sequences over shorter ones. More broadly, this paper demonstrates the utility of submodular optimization for computational biology. Applying submodular optimization to a new problem has two simple steps: (1) devise a submodular objective function, and (2) apply a standard optimization algorithm to this objective. Therefore, we believe that the strategy we employ here will have analogous applications to hundreds of other problems in computational biology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.819
Threshold uncertainty score0.544

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.161
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicComplexity and Algorithms in GraphsFrench-language works237,207