MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2888404131 · doi:10.1088/1361-651x/aadc20

An efficient full-field crystal plasticity-based M–K framework to study the effect of 3D microstructural features on the formability of polycrystalline materials

2018· article· en· W2888404131 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueModelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMetal Forming Simulation Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaGeneral Motors of CanadaUniversité de Sherbrooke
KeywordsMaterials scienceFormabilityCrystal plasticityCrystallitePlasticityMetallurgyField (mathematics)Composite materialCrystallography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In this paper, the new rate tangent–fast Fourier transform-based elasto-viscoplastic crystal plasticity (CP) constitutive framework (RTCP-FFT) developed by Nagra et al (2017 Int. J. Plast. 98 65–82) is implemented in the so-called Marciniak–Kuczynski (M–K) (Marciniak and Kuczyński 1967 Int. J. Mech. Sci. 9 609–20) framework to predict the forming limit diagrams (FLDs) of face-centered cubic polycrystals. The RTCP-FFT approach that accounts for 3D grain morphologies and grain interactions is used to compute the FLDs for aluminum alloys (AAs). The model employs two statistically representative volume elements with identical initial microstructures, one inside the imperfection band region (required for M–K analysis) and other outside the imperfection band region of the sheet metal. The proposed RTCP-FFT-based M–K model is a full-field, mesh-free and efficient CP formulation that enables a comprehensive investigation of the effects of 3D microstructural features on the FLDs with extremely small computational times. The new model is validated by comparing the predicted FLDs for AA5754 and AA3003 AAs with experimental measurements. Furthermore, the predicted FLDs are compared with the well-known Taylor-type homogenization scheme-based M–K model (MK–Taylor) predictions. Furthermore, the effects of different grain shapes as well as local grain interactions on the FLD predictions are studied. The study reveals that among the various microstructural features, the grain morphology has the strongest effect on the predicted FLDs and the FLD predictions can be significantly improved if the actual grain structure of the material is properly accounted for in the numerical models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.112
Threshold uncertainty score0.337

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it