Maternal Psychosocial Risk Profiles in Pregnancy: Associations With Postpartum Maternal Health and Child Outcomes
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Previous research on prenatal stress and social support has primarily involved variable-centered approaches, with limited knowledge on whether profiles exist, how early childhood adversity experiences predict these profiles, and whether these profiles are differentially associated with maternal and child outcomes postnatally. Using a pregnancy cohort ( N = 1,994), we identify three distinct profiles of maternal stress and maternal social support: low stress–high support (69.4%), moderate stress–moderate support (25.7%), and high stress–low support (4.9%). Mothers in the high stress–low support group experienced more physical/emotional abuse in childhood, whereas mothers in the moderate stress–moderate support group experienced more family dysfunction. The moderate and the high stress groups had poorer reproductive and physical health, and mothers reported their children had poorer developmental outcomes compared with the low stress–high support mothers. Identifying levels of stress and social support in pregnancy and implementing interventions for mothers at risk is crucial in the pursuit to mitigate family-wide deleterious outcomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it