MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2888793388 · doi:10.5430/wje.v8n4p170

The Effect of Flipped Classroom on the Academic Achievement and Attitude of Higher Education Students

2018· article· en· W2888793388 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld Journal of Education · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInnovative Teaching Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematics educationFlipped classroomGrammarAcademic achievementPsychologyTest (biology)Quasi-experimentControl (management)Foreign languageTreatment and control groupsBlended learningFlipped learningEducational technologyComputer scienceMathematicsSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study aims to search the effect of flipped classroom on students’ learning a new grammar structure and theirattitudes towards the English course. The study was carried out for 6 weeks with 56 students studying in fivedifferent preparatory classes at a black sea region university’s foreign languages school in the fall term of 2015-2016academic year. The design of the study was ‘non-equivalent control group design’ which is one ofquasi-experimental designs. Data were gathered with help of an achievement test and an attitude scale. Flippedclassroom model was applied in the experimental group while traditional instruction was applied in the control group.At the end of the study, it was concluded that flipped classroom had medium effect on students’ academicachievements and attitudes comparing to traditional instruction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.216
Threshold uncertainty score0.286

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.455
Teacher spread0.418 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it