Spark-based data analytics of sequence motifs in large omics data
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Data explosion in bioinformatics in recent years has led to new challenges for researchers to develop novel techniques to discover new knowledge from the avalanche of omics data (e.g., genomics, proteomics, transcriptomics). These data are embedded with a wealth of information including frequently repeated patterns (i.e., sequence motifs). In genomics, deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) sequence motifs are short repeated contiguous frequent subsequences located in the prompter region. Due to the high volume and various degrees of veracity of these DNA datasets generated by the next-generation sequencing techniques, sequence motif mining from DNA sequences poised a major challenge in bioinformatics. In this article, we present a distributed sequential algorithm—which uses the MapReduce programming model on a cluster of homogeneous distributed-memory system running on an Apache Spark computing framework—for DNA sequence motif mining. Experimental results show the effectiveness of our algorithm in Spark-based data analytics of sequence motifs in large omics data.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.016 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it