Fully Functional Suffix Trees and Optimal Text Searching in BWT-Runs Bounded Space
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Indexing highly repetitive texts—such as genomic databases, software repositories and versioned text collections—has become an important problem since the turn of the millennium. A relevant compressibility measure for repetitive texts is r , the number of runs in their Burrows-Wheeler Transforms (BWTs). One of the earliest indexes for repetitive collections, the Run-Length FM-index, used O ( r ) space and was able to efficiently count the number of occurrences of a pattern of length m in a text of length n (in O ( m log log n ) time, with current techniques). However, it was unable to locate the positions of those occurrences efficiently within a space bounded in terms of r . In this article, we close this long-standing problem, showing how to extend the Run-Length FM-index so that it can locate the occ occurrences efficiently (in O ( occ log log n ) time) within O ( r ) space. By raising the space to O ( r log log n ), our index counts the occurrences in optimal time, O ( m ), and locates them in optimal time as well, O ( m + occ ). By further raising the space by an O ( w / log σ) factor, where σ is the alphabet size and w = Ω (log n ) is the RAM machine size in bits, we support count and locate in O (⌈ m log (σ)/ w ⌉) and O (⌈ m log (σ)/ w ⌉ + occ ) time, which is optimal in the packed setting and had not been obtained before in compressed space. We also describe a structure using O ( r log ( n / r )) space that replaces the text and extracts any text substring of length ℓ in the almost-optimal time O (log ( n / r )+ℓ log (σ)/ w ). Within that space, we similarly provide access to arbitrary suffix array, inverse suffix array, and longest common prefix array cells in time O (log ( n / r )), and extend these capabilities to full suffix tree functionality, typically in O (log ( n / r )) time per operation. Our experiments show that our O ( r )-space index outperforms the space-competitive alternatives by 1--2 orders of magnitude in time. Competitive implementations of the original FM-index are outperformed by 1--2 orders of magnitude in space and/or 2--3 in time.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.010 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".