MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2890595286 · doi:10.1386/public.29.57.68_1

Hip Hop Archives or an Archive of Hip Hop? A Remix Impulse

2018· article· en· W2890595286 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePublic · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicDigital and Traditional Archives Management
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEthosHop (telecommunications)SociologyAestheticsArtPolitical scienceTelecommunicationsLawEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The archivization of hip hop history by American Universities has been a reality for at least one decade, at schools like Harvard, Cornell and Tulane. Institutions of higher learning are, in the words of Foucault producing discursive possibilities for the public life of hip hop histories, creating what is sayable (Foucault 1969:61). Simultaneously, the archivization of hip hop by American Universities is also a “privileging” project, as Mbembe suggests, conferring “status” on information that can shape the future of knowledge production (2002:20). What is at stake here, is not just the future of what can be said, but also the role of a counter, rogue or institutional archive in honouring the ethos of hip hop culture in ways that do not empty the culture of its innovative and interventional aesthetic approach topower.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.804
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it