MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2890736047 · doi:10.1109/msp.2018.2844952

Sparse Signal Processing for Grant-Free Massive Connectivity: A Future Paradigm for Random Access Protocols in the Internet of Things

2018· article· en· W2890736047 on OpenAlexaff
Liang Liu, Erik G. Larsson, Wei Yu, Petar Popovski, Čedomir Stefanović, Elisabeth de Carvalho

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Signal Processing Magazine · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceRandom accessCompressed sensingKey (lock)EmbeddingLatency (audio)WirelessInternet of ThingsMIMOFocus (optics)Distributed computingComputer networkTelecommunicationsEmbedded systemMachine learningArtificial intelligenceChannel (broadcasting)Computer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The next wave of wireless technologies will proliferate in connecting sensors, machines, and robots for myriad new applications, thereby creating the fabric for the Internet of Things (IoT). A generic scenario for IoT connectivity involves a massive number of machine-type connections, but in a typical application, only a small (unknown) subset of devices are active at any given instant; therefore, one of the key challenges of providing massive IoT connectivity is to detect the active devices first and then decode their data with low latency. This article advocates the usage of grant-free, rather than grantbased random access schemes to overcome the challenge of massive IoT access. Several key signal processing techniques that promote the performance of the grant-free strategies are outlined, with a primary focus on advanced compressed sensing techniques and their applications for the efficient detection of active devices. We argue that massive multiple-input, multiple-output (MIMO) is especially well suited for massive IoT connectivity because the device detection error can be driven to zero asymptotically in the limit as the number of antennas at the base station (BS) goes to infinity by using the multiplemeasurement vector (MMV) compressed sensing techniques. This article also provides a perspective on several related important techniques for massive access, such as embedding short messages onto the device-activity detection process and the coded random access.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations517
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Signal Processing MagazineSame topicSparse and Compressive Sensing TechniquesFrench-language works237,207