MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2890802274 · doi:10.1190/segam2018-2996047.1

Effects of transmitting-current full waveform on transient electromagnetic responses: Insights from 3D forward modeling

2018· article· en· W2890802274 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectromagnetic Launch and Propulsion Technology
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWaveformTransient (computer programming)Current (fluid)Transient analysisComputer scienceTransient responseElectronic engineeringAcousticsElectrical engineeringPhysicsEngineeringVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In transient electromagnetic (TEM) methods, transmitting-current full waveform is expected to have effects on TEM responses. A 3D FETD forward modeling solver is used to investigate this effect on TEM responses in this study. The numerical results for a half-space model show that full waveform, especially the turn-off time and steady time, has obvious effects on TEM responses for the times after the turn-off time. Synthetic TEM data for the Albany graphite deposit also suggest that the response is changed significantly from the pure step-off response by the effect of the full waveform, especially for the early times. In addition, the Albany graphite deposit model demonstrates that the sign changes caused by high-contrast conductivities do exist in practical TEM exploration surveys. Presentation Date: Wednesday, October 17, 2018 Start Time: 9:20:00 AM Location: Poster Station 13 Presentation Type: Poster

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.255
Threshold uncertainty score0.959

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it