Separating Function Estimation Test for Binary Distributed Radar Detection With Unknown Parameters
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper addresses the problem of distributed detection in the case where, under the signal-present hypothesis, the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) is unknown and/or observations are correlated. We assume that each local detector makes a (binary) decision while meeting a local false alarm constraint; it then transmits its decision to a fusion center. The unknown SNR at each local detector induces an unknown probability of detection and, hence, the optimal detector at the fusion center does not exist. We begin with the case most often considered in the literature: independent observations. In this case, we derive the asymptotically optimal separating function estimation test (AOSFET) and the generalized likelihood ratio test (GLRT). Moreover, we propose a method to set the local false alarm rates to achieve the maximum probability of detection at the fusion center (while meeting a constraint on the global probability of false alarm). The second part of this paper considers the case of correlated observations. We show that the AOSFET for this problem does not exist. As alternatives, we propose three suboptimal SFETs: based on an approximation to the AOSFET, the Kullback-Leibler divergence, and the Euclidean distance of the estimated probability mass function (pmf) of the observations under each hypotheses. Finally, we propose two methods to improve the performance of the estimation of the pmfs using a library of training labeled data based on the maximum likelihood estimation and expected maximization methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.048 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".