MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2891132725 · doi:10.23889/ijpds.v3i4.1033

Development and Characteristics of the Provincial Overdose Cohort in British Columbia, Canada

2018· article· en· W2891132725 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal for Population Data Science · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOpioid Use Disorder Treatment
Canadian institutionsMinistry of HealthProvincial Health Services AuthorityBC Centre for Disease Control
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOpioid overdoseMedicineCoronerMedical emergencyEmergency medicineDrug overdoseCohortEmergency departmentPsychological interventionMedical prescriptionPopulationPublic healthPolysubstance dependencePoison controlFamily medicineSuicide preventionEnvironmental healthOpioidSubstance abusePsychiatry(+)-NaloxoneNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

IntroductionBritish Columbia has the highest rate of opioid overdose in Canada, driven by the use of illegal opioids such as fentanyl. In addition to ongoing surveillance, there is a need for more comprehensive data to identify risk factors, inform the development of interventions, and evaluate the public health emergency response.
 Objectives and ApproachThe Provincial Overdose Cohort is a linked administrative dataset based on information from hospital admissions, physician visits, prescription dispensations, poison centre calls, ambulance, emergency department, coroner’s data, and First Nations Client File. Overdoses in the province were identified for the period January 2015-November 2016. Overdoses occurring within a 24 hour period across data sources were grouped as a single episode. For identified cases and for a control population (a 20% random sample of the BC residents), health care and prescribing history was appended dating back to 2010. Initial analyses were conducted based on a prioritization process with knowledge users.
 ResultsIntegration of distinct data sources about overdose events provided a more complete understanding of the extent of the opioid crisis than use of a single dataset alone. Between January 1, 2015 and November 30, 2016 10,456 overdoses occurred in BC. Overdose deaths represented only 13% of individuals overdosing; 54% of all overdoses were captured through ambulance records and 46\% through emergency and hospital records, with some overlap between the datasets. Most cases had contact with the health care system in the year before overdose suggesting opportunities for intervention. Some demographic differences were noted when comparing fatal and non-fatal overdoses, but few differences in health or prescribing histories were identifiable using administrative data.
 Conclusion/ImplicationsThe Provincial Overdose Cohort is a uniquely comprehensive dataset in a jurisdiction at the forefront of the opioid overdose response. Jurisdictions developing surveillance systems should consider the inclusion of ambulance, emergency room and hospital data in order to more completely characterize the population at risk.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.478
Threshold uncertainty score0.564

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it