MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2891214310 · doi:10.1109/lra.2018.2890572

Trajectory Generation for Multiagent Point-To-Point Transitions via Distributed Model Predictive Control

2019· article· en· W2891214310 on OpenAlexafffund
Carlos E. Luis, Angela P. Schoellig

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Robotics and Automation Letters · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Control Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsDynamic Systems Analysis (Canada)University of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsTrajectoryModel predictive controlComputer sciencePoint (geometry)Control (management)Control theory (sociology)Artificial intelligenceMathematicsPhysicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This letter introduces a novel algorithm for multiagent offline trajectory generation based on distributed model predictive control. Central to the algorithm's scalability and success is the development of an on-demand collision avoidance strategy. By predicting future states and sharing this information with their neighbors, the agents are able to detect and avoid collisions while moving toward their goals. The proposed algorithm can be implemented in a distributed fashion and reduces the computation time by more than 85% compared to previous optimization approaches based on sequential convex programming, while only having a small impact on the optimality of the plans. The approach was validated both through extensive simulations and experimentally with teams of up to 25 quadrotors flying in confined indoor spaces.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations150
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Robotics and Automation LettersSame topicAdvanced Control Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207