MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2892021372 · doi:10.1111/exsy.12520

A supervised learning approach for heading detection

2020· preprint· en· W2892021372 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueExpert Systems · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicText and Document Classification Technologies
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceClassifier (UML)PopularityArtificial intelligenceHeading (navigation)Supervised learningAutomationVariety (cybernetics)Field (mathematics)Machine learningFeature extractionData miningPattern recognition (psychology)EngineeringArtificial neural networkMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract As the popularity of the portable document format (PDF) file format increases, research that facilitates PDF text analysis or extraction is necessary. Heading detection is a crucial component of PDF‐based text classification processes. This research involves training a supervised learning model to detect headings by systematically testing and selecting classifier features using recursive feature elimination . Results indicate that decision tree is the best classifier with an accuracy of 95.83%, sensitivity of 0.981, and a specificity of 0.946. This research into heading detection contributes to the field of PDF‐based text extraction and can be applied to the automation of large scale PDF text analysis in a variety of professional and policy‐based contexts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.950
Threshold uncertainty score0.971

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it