MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2892912782 · doi:10.1088/1361-6560/aae3c3

Meshfree simulations of ultrasound vector flow imaging using smoothed particle hydrodynamics

2018· article· en· W2892912782 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics in Medicine and Biology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesNational Institutes of HealthInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche MédicaleFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéNational Institute for Health and Care Research
KeywordsComputational fluid dynamicsSmoothed-particle hydrodynamicsComputer scienceFlow (mathematics)Doppler effectUltrasoundAcousticsMechanicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Before embarking on a series of in vivo tests, design of ultrasound-flow-imaging modalities are generally more efficient through computational models as multiple configurations can be tested methodically. To that end, simulation models must generate realistic blood flow dynamics and Doppler signals. The current in silico ultrasound simulation techniques suffer mainly from uncertainty in providing accurate trajectories of moving ultrasound scatterers. In mesh-based Eulerian methods, numerical truncation errors from the interpolated velocities, both in the time and space dimensions, can accumulate significantly and make the pathlines unreliable. These errors can distort beam-to-beam inter-correlation present in ultrasound flow imaging. It is thus a technical issue to model a correct motion of the scatterers by considering their interaction with boundaries and neighboring scatterers. We hypothesized that in silico analysis of emerging ultrasonic imaging modalities can be implemented more accurately with meshfree approaches. We developed an original fluid-ultrasound simulation environment based on a meshfree Lagrangian CFD (computational fluid dynamics) formulation, which allows analysis of ultrasound flow imaging. This simulator combines smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) and Fourier-domain linear acoustics (SIMUS = simulator for ultrasound imaging). With such a particle-based computation, the fluid particles also acted as individual ultrasound scatterers, resulting in a direct and physically sound fluid-ultrasonic coupling. We used the in-house algorithms for fluid and ultrasound simulations to simulate high-frame-rate vector flow imaging. The potential of the particle-based method was tested in 2D simulations of vector Doppler for the intracarotid flow. The Doppler-based velocity fields were compared with those issued from SPH. The numerical evaluations showed that the vector flow fields obtained by vector Doppler components were in good agreement with the original SPH velocities, with relative errors less than 10% and 2% in the cross-beam and axial directions, respectively. Our results showed that SPH-SIMUS coupling enables direct and realistic simulations of ultrasound flow imaging. The proposed coupled algorithm has also the advantage to be 3D compatible and parallelizable.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.741
Threshold uncertainty score0.243

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it