MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2892942998 · doi:10.1353/tech.2018.0067

Energy and Civilization: A History

2018· article· en· W2892942998 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Brian Black

Bibliographic record

VenueTechnology and Culture · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicGlobal Energy and Sustainability Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCivilizationEnergy (signal processing)ScholarshipHyperboleHistoryClassicsLiteratureLawPolitical scienceMetaphorPhilosophyArtArchaeologyLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Energy and Civilization:A History Brian Black (bio) Vaclav Smil. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2017. Pp. 568. Hardcover $39.95. As a sub-discipline of the History of Technology, the study of energy has expanded significantly in the last few decades. Some of this new scholarship has looked at microscopic case studies, such as pipeline development, tar sand mining, and fracking for natural gas. Since 2010 other writing has tied energy studies to meta-historical ideas, such as the "Anthropocene," including the work of John R. McNeill and Andreas Malm. It is not hyperbole, though, to say that in each of these courses of inquiry, scholars of energy begin with the writing of Vaclav Smil, distinguished professor emeritus at the University of Manitoba. For this reason, his new book Energy and Civilization is a welcome addition to the literature. Author of more than forty books and named by Foreign Policy as one of the Top 100 Global Thinkers in 2010, Smil has produced work that strikes some scholars as overly sweeping or idiosyncratic. Whether this is the case or not, Smil has served as a starting point for anyone considering the larger implications of the human need for energy. More than any of his previous works, Energy and Civilization serves this role as the single best source book on the relationship between humans and energy. Energy and Civilization is a significantly revised, updated, and more detailed version of Energy in World History (Westview, 1994). In its sweep, Smil uses the concept of energy to quantify the energy expended by foragers, hunters, and agrarian societies, the implications of burning fossil fuels, and promising new technologies in renewable sources. Itemizing the essential relationship between our species and energy is the goal that spans chronology and geography to provide a common frame of reference for all humans. Life on Earth depends on the photosynthetic conversion of solar energy into plant biomass, which is the foundational energy relationship in nature. Over our history, humans have come to rely on a variety of variant energy flows—ranging from fossil fuels to photovoltaic generation of electricity—for [End Page 787] their civilized existence. We are the only species that can systematically harness energies outside our bodies, using the power of intellect and a great array of artifacts—from simple tools to nuclear reactors—to make energy serve our needs. Smil nicely organizes humanity's energy eras to form an effective overview; however, he is not a historian. Energy and Civilization lacks a strong narrative or an edgy central hypothesis. But Smil does provide economic and geopolitical context, supported by his trademark diagrams and graphs of remarkable data. These alone will make Energy and Civilization a must-have sourcebook for scholars from many disciplines. Typically, his data sets can be rather selective or inconclusive (one of my favorites in the appendix is a table delineating the power created by prime movers through history—the wax candle through the nuclear power plant; it is truly fascinating, though we know little of his sources or the details of measurement. But the numbers are truly evocative!) Such enticing data sets have offered many scholars fascinating lines of inquiry of their own, and Energy and Civilization will likely do so for a new generation. Smil concludes with some broader points on patterns of energy use in human society. He notes that advances in the capacity to harness energy have led to huge improvements in human well-being, including greater mobility and illumination; however, many politicians, Smil observes, have fallen prey to over-committing to specific energy innovations as a panacea. He also argues that artificial regulation to guide energy markets—such as subsidies for specific fuels—may do more harm than good. In the case of fossil fuels, he argues that regulations have locked economies into energy-intensive and polluting consumption patterns, which makes them and us more vulnerable to price shocks, trade-balance deficits, political pressures from energy companies, and pollution. Ultimately, he warns that the long-term survival of our high-energy civilization remains uncertain, though he offers no specific solution. While readers looking for insightful analysis and new theories about energy might be disappointed by Energy and Civilization...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.065

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.008
Science and technology studies0.0050.015
Scholarly communication0.0080.008
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations134
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTechnology and CultureSame topicGlobal Energy and Sustainability ResearchFrench-language works237,207