Standing lattice solitons in the discrete NLS equation with saturation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract We consider standing lattice solitons for discrete nonlinear Schrödinger equation with saturation (NLSS), where so-called transparent points were recently discovered. These transparent points are the values of the governing parameter (e.g. the lattice spacing) for which the Peierls–Nabarro barrier vanishes. In order to explain the existence of transparent points, we study a solitary wave solution in the continuous NLSS and analyse the singularities of its analytic continuation in the complex plane. The existence of a quadruplet of logarithmic singularities nearest to the real axis is proven and applied to two settings: (i) the fourth-order differential equation arising as the next-order continuum approximation of the discrete NLSS and (ii) the advance-delay version of the discrete NLSS. In the context of (i), the fourth-order differential equation generally does not have solitary wave solutions due to small oscillatory tails. Nevertheless, we show that solitary waves solutions exist for specific values of governing parameter that form an infinite sequence. We present an asymptotic formula for the distance between two subsequent elements of the sequence in terms of the small parameter of lattice spacing. To derive this formula, we used two different analytical techniques: the semi-classical limit of oscillatory integrals and the beyond-all-order asymptotic expansions. Both produced the same result that is in excellent agreement with our numerical data. In the context of (ii), we also derive an asymptotic formula for values of lattice spacing for which approximate standing lattice solitons can be constructed. The asymptotic formula is in excellent agreement with the numerical approximations of transparent points. However, we show that the asymptotic formulas for the cases (i) and (ii) are essentially different and that the transparent points do not generally imply existence of continuous standing lattice solitons in the advance-delay version of the discrete NLSS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it