MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2894767217 · doi:10.31937/akuntansi.v6i2.187

Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Perilaku Wajib Pajak Terhadap Penggunaan E-Filing

2014· article· en· W2894767217 on OpenAlexaff
Lavenia Herawan, Waluyo Waluyo

Bibliographic record

VenueUltimaccounting Jurnal Ilmu Akuntansi · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSMEs Development and Digital Marketing
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTaxpayerPsychologyUsabilityResearch ObjectSocial psychologyApplied psychologyBusinessPolitical scienceComputer scienceBusiness administrationLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this research is to analyze the influence of perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, security and privacy to the use of e-Filing. The object of this research is the individual taxpayer who uses e-Filing and registered in the Tax Office (KPP) Pratama Kosambi.. This research used primary data in the form of questionnaires were 117 pieces. The method used in this research is the causal study and the sampling technique that used is convenience sampling. The method that used is multiple regression analysis. The results of this study indicate that: (1) perceived usefulness has influence on the use of e-Filing, (2) perceived ease of use has influence on the use of e-Filing, (3) the security and privac has influence on the use of e-Filing, (4) perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, security and privacy have influence simultaneously on the use of e-Filing. Keywords: perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, security and privacy, the use of Filing

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.021
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.046

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.021
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUltimaccounting Jurnal Ilmu AkuntansiSame topicSMEs Development and Digital MarketingFrench-language works237,207