MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2894994565 · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2018.10.167

Resource Management Approach to an Efficient Wireless Sensor Network

2018· article· en· W2894994565 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProcedia Computer Science · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEnergy Efficient Wireless Sensor Networks
Canadian institutionsAcadia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRedundancy (engineering)Computer scienceWireless sensor networkEnergy consumptionKey distribution in wireless sensor networksWirelessComputer networkEfficient energy useEmbedded systemReal-time computingDistributed computingWireless networkTelecommunicationsElectrical engineeringOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Measurements of energy consumption is an important prerequisite in the development of Wireless Sensor Network (WSN) applications. WSNs are usually deployed to remote locations to monitor physical phenomena such as humidity, temperature, and pressure. The sensors in WSN applications are powered by batteries. The lifetime of these sensors and the overall functionality of the WSN relies on the lifespan of the batteries. Redundancy is experienced in the WSN when many sensors are deployed to an area to monitor a phenomenon. Redundancy leads to energy wastage as such the lifetime of the WSN is negatively impacted. Towards this end, this paper proposes an approach to reduce redundancy, achieve efficiency, and then extend the lifetime of the sensors in a WSN. The approach is the introduction of a Resource Management Algorithmto the WSN. To demonstrate feasibility of this approach, TinyOS Simulator is utilized.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Open science
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.392
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0060.003
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it