MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2894994565 · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2018.10.167

Resource Management Approach to an Efficient Wireless Sensor Network

2018· article· en· W2894994565 on OpenAlexaff
Elhadi Shakshuki, Stephen Isiuwe

Bibliographic record

VenueProcedia Computer Science · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEnergy Efficient Wireless Sensor Networks
Canadian institutionsAcadia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRedundancy (engineering)Computer scienceWireless sensor networkEnergy consumptionKey distribution in wireless sensor networksWirelessComputer networkEfficient energy useEmbedded systemReal-time computingDistributed computingWireless networkTelecommunicationsElectrical engineeringOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Measurements of energy consumption is an important prerequisite in the development of Wireless Sensor Network (WSN) applications. WSNs are usually deployed to remote locations to monitor physical phenomena such as humidity, temperature, and pressure. The sensors in WSN applications are powered by batteries. The lifetime of these sensors and the overall functionality of the WSN relies on the lifespan of the batteries. Redundancy is experienced in the WSN when many sensors are deployed to an area to monitor a phenomenon. Redundancy leads to energy wastage as such the lifetime of the WSN is negatively impacted. Towards this end, this paper proposes an approach to reduce redundancy, achieve efficiency, and then extend the lifetime of the sensors in a WSN. The approach is the introduction of a Resource Management Algorithmto the WSN. To demonstrate feasibility of this approach, TinyOS Simulator is utilized.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProcedia Computer ScienceSame topicEnergy Efficient Wireless Sensor NetworksFrench-language works237,207