MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2895132673 · doi:10.3968/10412

Evaluation of Local Viscosifiers as an Alternative to Conventional Pac-R

2018· article· en· W2895132673 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in petroleum exploration and development · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDrilling and Well Engineering
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDrilling fluidRheologyYield (engineering)BentoniteViscosityLiquefactionDrillingPulp and paper industryChemistryGeotechnical engineeringMaterials scienceComposite materialGeologyEngineeringMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hole cleaning is a key parameter in every drilling program. Efficient bottom hole cleaning is achieved through adequate transportation of cuttings from the wellbore to the surface. Modified natural polymers like Poly anionic cellulose regular (PAC-R), with bentonite clay has been used to achieve good carrying capacity of drilled cuttings in water base mud (WBM). These conventional polymers have adverse effect on the environment, especially the mud-filtrate which pollutes and contaminates the aquifer and the spent mud that requires caution for its disposal. In this work, Local viscosifers were obtained from Mucuna Flagellipe (Ukpo), Brachystegea Eurycoma (Achi), Afzelia Africana (Akpalata) and Detarium microcapum (Ofor) as a substitute for the imported viscosifiers (PAC R) used as a drilling fluid additives. Water-based muds were formulated from the aforementioned locally sourced viscosifiers and that of the conventionally used viscosifier (Pac-R). Laboratory tests were carried out on the different muds formulated and their rheological properties evaluated, such as yield stress, , shear stress plastic viscosity and shear rate. The concentrations of the locally sourced viscosifiers were varied and rheological tests performed show that Mucuna Flagellipe (Ukpo) had a better viscosity compared to Achi, Akplata and Ofor of the same concentration. It was also observed that 5g of Mucuna Flagellipe (Ukpo) and 8g of detarium microcapum (Ofor) gave an equivalent rheological properties of 27lb/100ft2and 26lb/100ft2 as yield stress when compared to2g of Pac-R which gave a yield point of 29lb/100ft2 at a temperature of 180˚F. Also, 8g of Mucuna Flagellipe (Ukpo) gave an equivalent of 5g of PAC-R. Hole cleaning parameters such as slip velocity, annular velocity and cuttings transport efficiency were also considered for evaluating the effectiveness of the proposed muds with local viscosifiers and conventional viscosifiers on hole cleaning. 5g and 8g of Mucuna Flagellipe (Ukpo) compared favourably with PAC-R in terms of hole cleaning. Finally in terms of cost, the locally sourced viscosifiers are cost effective when compared with the conventional vscosifier. Therefore, locally sourced viscosifiers (Mucuna Flagellipe, Ukpo) can be used as a substitute to the conventional Pac-R when drilling top hole at a temperature of 150˚F and below since these holes are drilled within a thermal gradient of 150˚F and below in the Niger delta region of Nigeria.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.883
Threshold uncertainty score0.363

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it