MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2895466636 · doi:10.1109/tcbb.2018.2873611

Plant Species Identification from Occluded Leaf Images

2018· article· en· W2895466636 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSmart Agriculture and AI
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsIdentification (biology)Plant identificationBiologyBotanyArtificial intelligenceComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present an approach to identify the plant species from the contour information from occluded leaf image using a database of full plant leaves. Although contour based 2D shape matching has been studied extensively in the last couple of decades, matching occluded leaves with full leaf databases is an open and little worked on problem. Classifying occluded plant leaves is even more challenging than full leaf matching because of large variations and complexity of leaf structures. Matching an occluded contour with all the full contours in a database is an NP-hard problem, so our algorithm is necessarily suboptimal. First, we represent the 2D contour points as a β-Spline curve. Then, we extract interest points on these curves via the Discrete Contour Evolution (DCE) algorithm. We use subgraph matching using the DCE points as graph nodes, which produces a number of open curves for each closed leaf contour. Next, we compute the similarity transformation parameters (translation, rotation, and uniform scaling) for each open curve. We then "overlay" each open curve with the inverse similarity transformed occluded curve and use the Fréchet distance metric to measure the quality of the match, retaining the best η matched curves. Since the Fréchet metric is cheap to compute but not perfectly correlated with the quality of the match, we formulate an energy functional that is well correlated with the quality of the match, but is considerably more expensive to compute. The functional uses local and global curvature, Shape Context descriptors, and String Cut features. We minimize this energy functional using a convex-concave relaxation framework. The curve among these best η curves, that has the minimum energy, is considered to be the best overall match with the occluded leaf. Experiments on three publicly available leaf image database shows that our method is both effective and efficient, outperforming other current state-of-the-art methods. Occlusion is measured as the percentage of the overall contour (and not leaf area) that is missing. We show that our algorithm can, even for leaves with a high amounts of occlusion (say 50 percent occlusion), still identify the best full leaf match from the databases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.524
Threshold uncertainty score0.410

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it