MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2895816042 · doi:10.1039/c8an01341a

Near-field infrared nanospectroscopy and super-resolution fluorescence microscopy enable complementary nanoscale analyses of lymphocyte nuclei

2018· article· en· W2895816042 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Analyst · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNear-Field Optical Microscopy
Canadian institutionsCancerCare ManitobaUniversity of WinnipegResearch Institute in Oncology and HematologyUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchU.S. Department of EnergyRegione Autonoma della SardegnaHealth Research BoardUniversity of ManitobaCancerCare Manitoba Foundation
KeywordsNanoscopic scaleMicroscopyFluorescence microscopeInfraredInfrared microscopyFluorescenceResolution (logic)ChemistryNanotechnologyMaterials scienceAnalytical Chemistry (journal)OpticsPhysicsEnvironmental chemistryComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recent super-resolution fluorescence microscopy (3D-Structured Illumination Microscopy, 3D-SIM) studies have revealed significantly altered nuclear organization between normal lymphocyte nuclei and those of classical Hodgkin's Lymphoma. Similar changes have been found in Multiple Myeloma (MM) nuclei, as well as in a premalignant condition, Monoclonal Gammopathy of Unknown Significance (MGUS). Using 3D-SIM, an increase in DNA-poor and DNA-free voids was evident in reconstructed 3D-SIM images of diseased nuclei at 40 nm pixel resolution (x,y: 40 nm, z: 80 nm). At best, far-field FTIR imaging yields spatially resolved images at ∼500 nm spatial resolution; however, near-field infrared imaging breaks the diffraction limit at a scale comparable to that of 3D-SIM, providing details on the order of 30 nm spatial resolution. We report here the first near-field IR imaging of lymphocyte nuclei, and far-field IR imaging results of whole lymphocytes and nuclei from normal human blood. Cells and nuclei were mounted on infrared-compatible substrates, including CaF2, undoped silicon wafers, and gold-coated silicon wafers. Thermal source far-field FTIR images were obtained with an Agilent-Cary 620 microscope, 15× objective, 0.62 NA and 64 × 64 array Focal Plane Array detector (University of Manitoba), or with a similar microscope equipped with both 15× and 25× (0.81 NA) objectives, 128 × 128 FPA and either thermal source or synchrotron source (single beam) infrared light at the Advanced Light Source (ALS), LBNL, Berkeley CA. Near-field IR spectra were acquired at the ALS, on the in-house SINS equipment, as well as with a Neaspec system, both illuminated with synchrotron light. Finally, some near-field IR spectra and images were acquired at Neaspec GmbH, Germany. Far-field IR spectra of normal cells and nuclei showed the characteristic bands of DNA and proteins. Near-field IR spectra of nuclei showed variations in bands assigned to protein and nucleic acids including single and double-stranded DNA. Near-field IR images of nuclei enabled visualization of protein and DNA distribution in spatially-resolved chromosome territories and nuclear pores.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.765

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it