Adaptive Path Following Control of Unmanned Surface Vehicles Considering Environmental Disturbances and System Constraints
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The current maritime applications have yielded strong demands for the development of advanced unmanned surface vehicles (USVs) with more reliable path following capabilities to greatly extend mission durations and enhance accommodative capabilities of USVs to more hazardous and dynamic environments. This paper presents an adaptive path following control method using a retrofit adaptive tracking control technique with application to a USV with consideration of environmental disturbances (like winds, waves, and currents), while taking into account of the system constraints of USVs, including both turning features (turning rate limit and turning dynamics) and rudder operation constraints (rudder deflection and rate saturation, and its dynamics). In order to guarantee the satisfactory performance of the USV operating in a calm environment, a baseline state feedback tracking controller considering the characteristics of yaw rate and rudder operations, and USV steering and actuator dynamics is first designed. In the presence of time-varying environmental disturbances, a retrofit adaptive disturbance compensating control mechanism is then developed based on the disturbance amplitude estimated from an indirect adaptive disturbance estimator. Finally, a reconfigurable adaptive path following controller is synthesized by combining the baseline controller and the adaptive disturbance compensating mechanism for the proper operation of the USV in the presence of environmental disturbances, while the desired path is successfully followed by the USV within an acceptable deviation boundary and without violating constraints of turning rates as well as amplitude and rate of rudder deflections. To evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed path following control methodology, both numerical simulations on a nonlinear USV model and field experiments on a real-size USV are conducted.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".