MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2897060222 · doi:10.1093/cdn/nzy079

A Systematic Review of the Quality of Life for Families Supporting a Child Consuming the Ketogenic Diet for Seizure Reduction

2018· review· en· W2897060222 on OpenAlexaff
Keira Poelzer, Cynthia Mannion, Mia Ortiz, Ryan Bang, Philip R. Woods

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Developments in Nutrition · 2018
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiet and metabolism studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKetogenic dietMedicineCINAHLPsychosocialPsycINFOQuality of life (healthcare)Observational studyPediatricsRandomized controlled trialEpilepsyMEDLINEKetosisPsychiatryInternal medicinePsychological interventionEndocrinologyNursingDiabetes mellitus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The ketogenic diet (KD) is a nonpharmacologic treatment to reduce seizures with moderate to high success in pediatric patients with intractable epilepsy. Initiated in hospital, parents continue the treatment at home ensuring the ratio of high fat to low carbohydrate/protein is maintained to achieve metabolic ketosis. We conducted a systematic review to examine the quality of life (QoL) for families with a child using the KD for the reduction in epileptic seizures. A systematic review of the literature was conducted from 2007-2014 using key terms and combinations of: "epilepsy," "ketogenic diet," "children," "family," and "quality of life." We accessed CINAHL, Medline, PubMed, and PsycINFO. After removing duplicates, we screened 598 papers by title and abstract. Articles comparing alternate diets such as the Atkins diet to the KD, or those focusing on the KD and societal costs, were excluded. Eighteen articles remained, including 7 intervention studies (randomized controlled trial and quasiexperimental), 7 descriptive studies (retrospective), 2 observational studies, and 2 case studies. Most participants were diagnosed with epilepsy at the age of 5 y, and had a trial of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) and had been using the KD after discharge from the hospital. QoL was infrequently reported as a primary variable and was defined in a variety of ways. We found recurring themes that could affect QoL: efficacy of seizure reduction, nutritional status, child growth and development, and child and family psychosocial impact. The dominant psychological factor was the need for counseling for parents and clear expectations on expected outcomes. Nonadherence and dropout rates were frequent, but unfortunately the reasons and timing were not well documented, and some of these could be associated with QoL. The success of the KD in seizure reduction addressed a primary parental concern. Further research should address KD adherence and dropout rates, and investigate factors of quality of life.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.047
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.048

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.047
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0080.007
Bibliometrics0.0120.016
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.121
GPT teacher head0.431
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Developments in NutritionSame topicDiet and metabolism studiesFrench-language works237,207