MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Subspace-Clustering-Based Multispectral Image Compression

2014· article· en· W2897104541 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueColor and Imaging Conference · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Data Compression Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultispectral imageLossless compressionLinear subspaceData compressionRedundancy (engineering)Hyperspectral imagingImage compressionJPEG 2000Cluster analysisComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceMultispectral pattern recognitionSubspace topologyDimension (graph theory)Pattern recognition (psychology)Compression (physics)MathematicsComputer visionAlgorithmImage processingImage (mathematics)PhysicsCombinatoricsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper describes a subspace clustering strategy for the spectral compression of multispectral images. Unlike standard PCA, this approach finds clusters in different subspaces of different dimension. Consequently, instead of representing all spectra in a single low-dimensional subspace of a fixed dimension, spectral data are assigned to multiple subspaces having a range of dimensions from one to eight. For a given compression ratio, this tradeoff reduces the maximum reconstruction error dramatically. In the case of compressing multispectral images, this initial compression step is followed by lossless JPEG2000 compression in order to remove the spatial redundancy in the data as well.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.944
Threshold uncertainty score0.691

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it