MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2897548380 · doi:10.4171/dm/x27

The homotopy type of the topological cobordism category

2022· article· en· W2897548380 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueDocumenta Mathematica · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicHomotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology
Canadian institutionsThe Scarborough HospitalUniversity of Toronto
FundersUniversity of TorontoNational Research FoundationNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaEuropean CommissionUniversity of OregonDanmarks GrundforskningsfondNational Science Foundation
KeywordsCobordismHomotopyHomotopy categoryMathematicsType (biology)Topology (electrical circuits)Pure mathematicsCombinatoricsBiologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We define a cobordism category of topological manifolds and prove that if d\neq 4 its classifying space is weakly equivalent to \Omega^{\infty -1}MT\mathrm{Top}(d) , where MT\mathrm{Top}(d) is the Thom spectrum of the inverse of the canonical bundle over B\mathrm{Top}(d) . We also give versions for manifolds with tangential structures and/or boundary. The proof uses smoothing theory and excision in the tangential structure to reduce the statement to the computation of the homotopy type of smooth cobordism categories due to Galatius–Madsen–Tillman–Weiss.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.055
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it