MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2898257166 · doi:10.1039/c8cs00185e

Excited-state intramolecular proton-transfer (ESIPT) based fluorescence sensors and imaging agents

2018· review· en· W2898257166 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Adam C. Sedgwick, Luling Wu, Hai‐Hao Han, Steven D. Bull, Xiao‐Peng He, Tony D. James, Jonathan L. Sessler, Ben Zhong Tang, He Tian, Juyoung Yoon

Bibliographic record

VenueChemical Society Reviews · 2018
Typereview
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicPhotochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEngineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilShanghai Rising-Star ProgramShanghai Normal UniversityNational Research Foundation of KoreaNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaRoyal Society of ChemistryUniversity of BathRoyal SocietyUniversity of QueenslandUniversity of OxfordCardiff UniversityProject 211University of East AngliaUniversity of VictoriaNational Institutes of HealthMinistry of Science, ICT and Future PlanningUniversity of BirminghamNational Research FoundationChina Scholarship CouncilInnovation and Technology CommissionWelch Foundation
KeywordsIntramolecular forceFluorescenceExcited stateProtonChemistryFluorescence-lifetime imaging microscopyAggregation-induced emissionPhotochemistryBiophysicsNanotechnologyMaterials scienceStereochemistryPhysicsOpticsBiologyAtomic physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this review we will explore recent advances in the design and application of excited-state intramolecular proton-transfer (ESIPT) based fluorescent probes. Fluorescence based sensors and imaging agents (probes) are important in biology, physiology, pharmacology, and environmental science for the selective detection of biologically and/or environmentally important species. The development of ESIPT-based fluorescence probes is particularly attractive due to their unique properties, which include a large Stokes shift, environmental sensitivity and potential for ratiometric sensing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1,505
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemical Society ReviewsSame topicPhotochemistry and Electron Transfer StudiesFrench-language works237,207