MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2899142389 · doi:10.23919/ipec.2018.8507794

Opportunities for Leveraging Low-Voltage GaN Devices in Modular Multi-level Converters for Electric-Vehicle Charging Applications

2018· article· en· W2899142389 on OpenAlexaff
Mojtaba Ashourloo, Mohammad Shawkat Zaman, Miad Nasr, Olivier Trescases

Bibliographic record

Venue2018 International Power Electronics Conference (IPEC-Niigata 2018 -ECCE Asia) · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHVDC Systems and Fault Protection
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConvertersDecoupling (probability)Modular designEMIVoltageElectrical engineeringPower (physics)Low voltageElectromagnetic interferenceHigh voltageElectronic engineeringComputer scienceElectric vehiclePower moduleMaterials scienceEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Modular multi-level converters (MMCs), already well-established in high-voltage, high-power AC-DC conversion, can potentially bring advantages in lower-power applications, such as on-board chargers in electric vehicles (EVs). The availability of mature, high-quality GaN devices with low voltage ratings have made it worthwhile to consider the MMCs for these applications, due to its limited voltage gradients and higher AC-side power quality. To investigate these possibilities, a simulated 6-level MMC is compared against an experimentally-validated two-level EV charger. Both converters are designed for a maximum power level of 6.6 kW and compatible with 240 V and 400 V AC-side and DC-link voltages, respectively. The study reveals that the MMC offers great promise in terms of power-quality improvement and AC-side filtering requirements, and the need for large sub-module capacitances to maintain the module voltages is counterbalanced by the reduced requirements for EMI filtering and DC-link decoupling.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2018 International Power Electronics Conference (IPEC-Niigata 2018 -ECCE Asia)Same topicHVDC Systems and Fault ProtectionFrench-language works237,207