MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2899636728 · doi:10.1186/s13677-018-0122-7

Using genetic algorithms to find optimal solution in a search space for a cloud predictive cost-driven decision maker

2018· article· en· W2899636728 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cloud Computing Advances Systems and Applications · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCloud Computing and Resource Management
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCloud computingComputer scienceScalingAlgorithmTotal costMathematical optimizationOperating systemMathematicsEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In a cloud computing environment there are two types of cost associated with the auto-scaling systems: resource cost and Service Level Agreement (SLA) violation cost. The goal of an auto-scaling system is to find a balance between these costs and minimize the total auto-scaling cost. However, the existing auto-scaling systems neglect the cloud client’s cost preferences in minimizing the total auto-scaling cost. This paper presents a cost-driven decision maker which considers the cloud client’s cost preferences and uses the genetic algorithm to configure a rule-based system to minimize the total auto-scaling cost. The proposed cost-driven decision maker together with a prediction suite makes a predictive auto-scaling system which is up to 25% more accurate than the Amazon auto-scaling system. The proposed auto-scaling system is scoped to the business tier of the cloud services. Furthermore, a simulation package is built to simulate the effect of VM boot-up time, Smart Kill, and configuration parameters on the cost factors of a rule-based decision maker.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.406
Threshold uncertainty score0.608

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it