MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2899778925 · doi:10.1109/cce.2018.8465572

Joint Resource Allocation, Computation Offloading, and Path Planning for UAV Based Hierarchical Fog-Cloud Mobile Systems

2018· article· en· W2899778925 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUAV Applications and Optimization
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCloudletComputer scienceCloud computingResource allocationDistributed computingComputation offloadingEdge computingComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, the computation offloading problem for the hierarchical fog-cloud computing (FCC) system with unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) is studied. The hierarchical FCC, which exploits both centralized and distributed computing architectures, is very promising to support computation offloading in emerging computation-demanding mobile applications. In our design, UAVs integrating computing platforms act as small distributed clouds while the macro base station (BS) integrates a more powerful central cloud server. Furthermore, the multiple input multiple output (MIMO) technology is employed for data communication. We assume that mobile users (UEs) and (UAVs) can change their locations over time and we consider the joint task offloading, user-cloud/cloudlet association, transmit power allocation, and path planning to minimize the total weighted consumed power of the system. To tackle the underlying non-convex mixed integer non-linear program (MINLP), we propose an iterative two-phase algorithm. Specifically, we iteratively solve the user-cloud/cloudlet association problem in the first phase and address the joint resource allocation, path planning problem in the second phase. Furthermore, we employ the difference of convex (DC) optimization method in the second phase to approximate the non-convex bilinear functions and propose to transform the non-convex INLP to the integer linear program (ILP) in the first phase. Numerical studies confirm that the proposed design for the FCC architecture achieves great performance benefits for executing mobile computation tasks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.926
Threshold uncertainty score0.374

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicUAV Applications and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207