MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2900168848 · doi:10.1109/icnp.2018.00031

INDAGO: A New Framework For Detecting Malicious SDN Applications

2018· article· en· W2900168848 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Malware Detection Techniques
Canadian institutionsKootenay Association for Science & Technology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMalwareComputer scienceSoftware-defined networkingSoftwareOpenFlowDistributed computingNetworking hardwareSystem callComputer networkEmbedded systemOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Software-Defined Networking (SDN) controllers not only provide centralized control of SDNs, but also implement open and programmable APIs to ultimately establish an open network environment, where anyone can develop and deliver useful SDN applications. In such an environment, malicious SDN applications can be easily developed and distributed by untrusted entities and can even possess full control of SDNs. Thus, the security threat of malicious SDN applications must be taken seriously. In this paper, we propose a novel system, called Indago, which statically analyzes SDN applications to model their behavioral profiles, and finally, it automatically detects malicious SDN applications with a machine learning approach. We implement a prototype system and evaluate its effectiveness with real world SDN applications and malware. Our evaluation results show that the system can detect most known SDN malware with a high detection rate and low error rates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.637
Threshold uncertainty score0.416

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Malware Detection TechniquesFrench-language works237,207