MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2900718920 · doi:10.1162/jinh_r_01329

<i>A Short History of Mozambique</i>

2018· article· en· W2900718920 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Interdisciplinary History · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGlobal Maritime and Colonial Histories
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPortugueseNarrativeGermanPoliticsQuarter (Canadian coin)ColonialismHistoryIndex (typography)Variety (cybernetics)Narrative historyClassicsEconomic historyPolitical scienceLawLiteratureArtArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Newitt’s Short History of Mozambique weighs in at less than half the length of his earlier History of Mozambique (Johannesburg, 1993), with which it overlaps in some coverage. It will also become a standard work. Newitt states and sharpens themes from his earlier work for the sixteenth through twentieth centuries, but then plunges into the unfamiliar and fraught territory of Mozambique’s twenty-first century experience. The book has two good colonial-era maps, one of concession companies and the other of provinces, ports, towns, rivers, railways, and airports in the early 1960s. The brief notes, the bibliography of suggested readings (mostly in English), and the index are less than one-quarter the length of the same features in the 1993 book. Advanced scholars will want to consult both of Newitt’s histories of Mozambique, not just this one.Readers of the Journal of Interdisciplinary History will appreciate Newitt’s use of the rich records of contemporary European observers, travelers, missionaries, and Portuguese archival sources, many of which he translated and edited himself. He generously weaves their perspectives throughout his historical narrative, emphasizing political, military, economic, and Portuguese strategic intentions. As is often the case, without comparable records from Africans, the narrative reveals more about European views, including their misunderstandings about Africans. Although Newitt interrogates perspectives and reads against the grain, his methods are archival and textual. Readers come away with a clearer sense of, say, the German Jesuit Mauriz Thoman than of many Mozambicans (42–47).Newitt necessarily turns to a variety of economic and political analyses when he moves into Mozambique’s recent economic policies and the political decisions that shaped them. Newitt begins with his long-held and fitting perspective that Mozambique’s physical geography shaped its history. The east to west trajectories inscribed by Mozambique’s rivers promoted regional networks that were and remain more important than an imagined national whole. Mozambique’s extremely long coastline, comprising one-third of East Africa, organically tied its peoples into the Indian Ocean maritime and islands world, and to the seasonal monsoons. Newitt explicitly refutes Frelimo’s (Front for the Liberation of Mozambique) nation-building mantra of a single people from the Ruvuma River in the north to the Maputo River in the south, arguing for the saliency of regional identities, in particular those to the north and south of the Zambezi.The populous north and central regions and the politically important but more sparsely populated south have experienced long-standing and keenly felt different histories. The fact that the ports of Beira and Maputo were and are better connected to the cities and economies of their hinterlands than to each other supports Newitt’s emphasis on regionalism. No significant north to south road or railway existed until the late colonial period when Portugal rapidly and defensively expanded Mozambique’s transportation infrastructure. As late as the 1960s, the only road connecting the country’s north and south passed through Nyasaland (129). Since the completion of the country’s north/south highway (N1) in 1973, transportation has periodically come to a halt when floods and bombs took out bridges or insurgents shut down or sharply diminished highway circulation. As recently as 2016, assaults along N1 earned it the epitaph “ghost road.”Related to Newitt’s emphasis on regions and environments is his emphasis on the enduring historical links between periodic droughts, famine, and disease crises that triggered violence, predation by armed men under the direction of emergent regional strongmen, and the sweep of the “cohorts of the destitute” into slave raids, forced labor, military conscription, urban migration, and related social upheaval (4). He carefully charts drought and famine crises during the 1570s, 1690s, 1760s, the turn of the nineteenth century, 1860s, 1920s, and into the independence period. The drought and famine of the early 1980s drove Frelimo to sign the humiliating Nkomati Accord with apartheid South Africa. Similarly, the killer drought of 1990/1 exhausted the opposing sides in Mozambique’s civil war and eventually brought them to the 1992 Rome Peace Accord. Newitt links geography, environment, social change, and continuity—firmly placed in time and space—with attention to a range of disciplines.The closing chapters employ statistical analysis from the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund, and the Economist Intelligence Unit to interrogate the impact of Poverty Reduction Action Plans in the twenty-first century. Newitt also draws profitably from political science, anthropology, and activist scholarship to make his points, but Women and the Law in Southern Africa’s (wlsa) interdisciplinary research on gender and family law and Negrão’s work on agriculture would have enhanced these chapters.1 Newitt’s broad range accounts for culture, discourses of power and the complex and often contradictory entanglements among ordinary people, Mozambican, and international political elites. His scathing assessment of development aid highlights the self-serving practices of well-placed people throughout Mozambique and its global connections.Newitt’s case for the intransigence of patrimonial power overriding pretentions of democracy and development seems increasingly fitting. With Frelimo secure in some regions and the Mozambican National Resistance (Renamo) increasingly secure in others, neither party was willing to cede political space. Daviz Simango, leader of the Democratic Movement of Mozambique (mdm), whose popular base in Beira potentially contends with both parties, recently spoke of the closely shared corruption, patrimonial ambitions, and exclusionary policies of Frenamo—a conflation of Frelimo and Renamo. Tragically, revealing and repeating Newitt’s observations regarding drought and destitution, ordinary Mozambicans will continue to pay the disproportionate costs of global warming while political elites squander and absorb revenues from Mozambique’s recently revealed oil and gas resources.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.756
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it