MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2900826703 · doi:10.4000/palethnologie.468

Maisons néolithiques : exemples méditerranéens

2016· article· fr· W2900826703 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePalethnologie · 2016
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArchaeological and Geological Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Au cours de cet exposé, seront présentés plusieurs modèles de maisons néolithiques et chalcolithiques de l’espace méditerranéen. À Chypre, le modèle de la maison ronde, apparu dès le PPNA, connaîtra une forte longévité au cours du PPNB, du Khirokitien et du Chalcolithique. En Italie du Sud-Est, les modèles sub-rectangulaires des débuts du Néolithique cèderont parfois la place à des plans circulaires ou oblongs lors du Chalcolithique (culture de Laterza : Trasano). Dans le Midi de la France, les maisons à infrastructure de pierre du Néolithique final-Chalcolithique autorisent, grâce à une analyse spatiale permise par la conservation des sols originels, d’esquisser une approche de "l’habiter".Dans chaque ère culturelle considérée, on observe des processus de continuité ou de rupture dans les architectures adoptées. En revanche, la notion de "maisonnée" est plus délicate à approcher car elle implique de cerner, dans le contexte villageois, le contenu humain de chaque unité domestique, un sujet largement spéculatif compte tenu des données archéologiques disponibles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.713
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.009
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.086
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it