Le plus ancien art mobilier : les statuettes aurignaciennes en ivoire du Jura souabe (sud-ouest de l’Allemagne)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Quatre grottes du Jura souabe ont livré un éventail spectaculaire d’art mobilier : Hohle Fels, Geißenklösterle, Vogelherd, et Hohlenstein-Stadel. Certaines de ces statuettes en ivoire sont bien connues, tandis que d’autres le sont moins. En tout, une cinquantaine de ces objets ou fragments ont été identifiés dans la région. Ils proviennent de niveaux archéologiques renfermant des instruments de musique (flûtes) et des témoignages anciens de peinture. En se basant sur des recherches récentes ainsi que sur les enregistrements de fouilles antérieures, cette contribution opte pour un format simple de questions-réponses afin de revisiter certains aspects de l’interprétation de l’art mobilier aurignacien. Certains de ces objets constituent les plus anciens artefacts figuratifs connus en Europe, et peut-être dans le monde. Les thèmes abordés ici comprennent des indications concernant les matières premières, l’iconographie, la datation, le contexte et les fondations sociales éventuelles de la production et de l’utilisation de ces objets.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".