MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2901601466 · doi:10.4000/palethnologie.885

Le plus ancien art mobilier : les statuettes aurignaciennes en ivoire du Jura souabe (sud-ouest de l’Allemagne)

2015· article· fr· W2901601466 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePalethnologie · 2015
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAncient and Medieval Archaeology Studies
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Quatre grottes du Jura souabe ont livré un éventail spectaculaire d’art mobilier : Hohle Fels, Geißenklösterle, Vogelherd, et Hohlenstein-Stadel. Certaines de ces statuettes en ivoire sont bien connues, tandis que d’autres le sont moins. En tout, une cinquantaine de ces objets ou fragments ont été identifiés dans la région. Ils proviennent de niveaux archéologiques renfermant des instruments de musique (flûtes) et des témoignages anciens de peinture. En se basant sur des recherches récentes ainsi que sur les enregistrements de fouilles antérieures, cette contribution opte pour un format simple de questions-réponses afin de revisiter certains aspects de l’interprétation de l’art mobilier aurignacien. Certains de ces objets constituent les plus anciens artefacts figuratifs connus en Europe, et peut-être dans le monde. Les thèmes abordés ici comprennent des indications concernant les matières premières, l’iconographie, la datation, le contexte et les fondations sociales éventuelles de la production et de l’utilisation de ces objets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.593
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.007
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it