Cone‐Beam Computed Tomography of Osteogenesis Imperfecta Types III and IV: Three‐Dimensional Evaluation of Craniofacial Features and Upper Airways
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT This cross‐sectional study investigated the natural history of craniofacial deformities in osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) and determined the impact of three‐dimensional (3D) analysis on diagnosis and treatment planning in orthodontics and orthognathic surgery in comparison to conventional two‐dimensional (2D) cephalometric examination. 3D images of the craniofacial complex were acquired during 1 calendar year using cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT) from a cohort of 41 individuals (aged 11 to 35 years; 28 females) with OI type III (n = 13) or IV (n = 28). 3D evaluation of the craniocervical junction and upper airways was conducted using InVivoTM. 2D lateral cephalogram was constructed, traced, and examined using the University of Western Ontario analysis (DolphinTM). Quantitative and qualitative parameters were compared between OI type III and type IV groups (unpaired t test) and the unaffected population (Z‐score). 3D evaluation revealed a high prevalence of craniocervical abnormalities, craniofacial asymmetries, and nasal septum deviation in both OI groups. Mean airway dimensions were comparable to the non‐affected population norms, except for 5 individuals who had insufficient airway dimensions. In 2D, the maxilla was retrognathic and hypoplastic, and the mandibular position was convergent with respect to the face, resulting in mandibular prognathism and face height reduction. The 2D trends were more pronounced in OI type III, whereas the 3D craniocervical and airway abnormalities were common in both types. This study illustrates the prevalence of craniofacial and airway anomalies in OI that occur along with facial deformities are not associated with postcranial phenotype and OI type, are apparent only in 3D evaluation, and are likely to influence treatment strategy. For OI patients, a team effort involving a dentist, orthodontist, neurologist, and ear‐nose‐throat (ENT) practitioner is recommended for successful management of craniofacial deformities. © 2018 The Authors JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".