MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2901627847 · doi:10.1002/jbm4.10124

Cone‐Beam Computed Tomography of Osteogenesis Imperfecta Types III and IV: Three‐Dimensional Evaluation of Craniofacial Features and Upper Airways

2018· article· en· W2901627847 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueJBMR Plus · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicConnective tissue disorders research
Canadian institutionsShriners Hospitals for Children - CanadaMcGill University
FundersNational Institute of Dental and Craniofacial ResearchNational Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentNational Center for Advancing Translational SciencesNational Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin DiseasesBanting and Best Diabetes Centre, University of TorontoRare Diseases Clinical Research NetworkNational Institutes of HealthOsteogenesis Imperfecta Foundation
KeywordsCone beam computed tomographyCraniofacialOsteogenesis imperfectaComputed tomographyOrthodonticsMedicineAnatomyRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT This cross‐sectional study investigated the natural history of craniofacial deformities in osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) and determined the impact of three‐dimensional (3D) analysis on diagnosis and treatment planning in orthodontics and orthognathic surgery in comparison to conventional two‐dimensional (2D) cephalometric examination. 3D images of the craniofacial complex were acquired during 1 calendar year using cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT) from a cohort of 41 individuals (aged 11 to 35 years; 28 females) with OI type III ( n = 13) or IV ( n = 28). 3D evaluation of the craniocervical junction and upper airways was conducted using InVivo TM . 2D lateral cephalogram was constructed, traced, and examined using the University of Western Ontario analysis (Dolphin TM ). Quantitative and qualitative parameters were compared between OI type III and type IV groups (unpaired t test) and the unaffected population ( Z ‐score). 3D evaluation revealed a high prevalence of craniocervical abnormalities, craniofacial asymmetries, and nasal septum deviation in both OI groups. Mean airway dimensions were comparable to the non‐affected population norms, except for 5 individuals who had insufficient airway dimensions. In 2D, the maxilla was retrognathic and hypoplastic, and the mandibular position was convergent with respect to the face, resulting in mandibular prognathism and face height reduction. The 2D trends were more pronounced in OI type III, whereas the 3D craniocervical and airway abnormalities were common in both types. This study illustrates the prevalence of craniofacial and airway anomalies in OI that occur along with facial deformities are not associated with postcranial phenotype and OI type, are apparent only in 3D evaluation, and are likely to influence treatment strategy. For OI patients, a team effort involving a dentist, orthodontist, neurologist, and ear‐nose‐throat (ENT) practitioner is recommended for successful management of craniofacial deformities. © 2018 The Authors JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.467
Threshold uncertainty score0.378

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it