MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Using TDA as an Engineered Stress-Reduction Fill over Preexisting Buried Pipes

2018· article· en· W2901678792 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsGeotechnical engineeringLateral earth pressureFinite element methodStress (linguistics)Settlement (finance)ScrapStructural engineeringEngineeringGeosyntheticsMaterials scienceMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Routing utility conduits underneath buildings is not always an avoidable situation, especially in densely populated and congested urban centers. Placing the pipe at a shallow depth attracts substantial additional earth pressures and loads causing overstressing and/or unacceptable deformations of the buried pipe. The backfill material characteristics control the pipe-soil interaction mechanism and sequentially the amount of exerted pressures. Tire-derived aggregate (TDA) is an engineered construction, lightweight backfilling material produced from recycled scrap tires. In the literature, TDA is often referred to as tire chips or tire shreds. TDA has excellent geotechnical properties, maintains its structural integrity, and weighs 50–60% less than conventional earth fill. In this paper, two full-scale field tests were conducted to evaluate the usefulness of using a layer of TDA above existing metal pipes to enhance the stress arching mechanism (i.e., stress bridging). In addition, the complicated pipe-soil interaction was investigated by monitoring the surface settlement, change of the pipe’s wall strains, and the pressure distribution over and around the pipe. The field results showed that using a layer of TDA over the pipe is significantly effective in reducing the pipe’s stresses and the magnitude of transferred pressures compared to using conventional backfill. Furthermore, three-dimensional finite element models (FEM) of the tests were developed to study the interaction mechanism of the considered problem, in which the developed models were validated against the field tests results. An excellent agreement was observed between the measured pipe’s strain values and surface settlements and the numerically obtained results. Additionally, an extensive parametric study was conducted to examine the effect of changing some key parameters on the performance of the investigated system (i.e., the thickness of the TDA layer, shape and configuration of the TDA cross section, and the pipe’s stiffness). This study illustrated that using a layer of TDA backfill above preexisting buried pipes is an excellent construction alternative to enhance the stress bridging mechanism under static loading conditions. The proposed system may lead to avoiding the costly pipeline rerouting option when there is a need for building over preexisting pipes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.409
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it