MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

QUICK TWO-WAY TIME MESSAGE EXCHANGE FOR TIME SYNCHRONIZATION IN ROBOT NETWORKS

2018· article· en· W2901752692 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Fanrong Shi, Xianguo Tuo, Jing Lu, Zhenwen Ren, Lili Ran

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Robotics and Automation · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Time Synchronization Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSouthwest UniversitySouthwest University of Science and TechnologyNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsSynchronization (alternating current)Computer scienceTime synchronizationRobotReal-time computingComputer networkArtificial intelligenceChannel (broadcasting)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Time synchronization is important for coordination and control in multiple robot networks.Two-way time message exchange (TTME) time synchronization is efficient, but due to variable response latency, it does not completely meet the requirements for quadrotor robot groups.Aiming to provide accurate time synchronization for robots, the proposed quick TTME synchronization starts a downlink after an uplink quickly and tries to maintain a fixed clock offset for the estimation.A timeout constraint is used to filter invalid observations and optimize clock offset estimation.This avoids the increasing clock offset caused by large software latencies and communication link delays, guarantees a fixed clock offset for TTME, and provides precise and stable clock offset estimation for time synchronization in robot networks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Robotics and AutomationSame topicNetwork Time Synchronization TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207