MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2901915193 · doi:10.25071/10315/35211

The Effect Of Nanoparticle Concentration On Mql Performance When Machining Ti-6Al-4V Titanium Alloy

2018· article· en· W2901915193 on OpenAlexafffund
Abdelkrem Eltaggaz, Ibrahim Deiab

Bibliographic record

VenueProgress in Canadian Mechanical Engineering · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced machining processes and optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsTitanium alloyMaterials scienceAlloyMachiningNanoparticleTitaniumMetallurgyNanotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The main purpose of using cutting fluid during machining processes is to reduce the cutting temperature and friction, and to wash away chips from the cutting zone.However, excessive use of conventional cutting fluid negatively influences human health and environment.Therefore, much research has attempted to improve cutting fluid performance with superior tribological and thermal properties, and to reduce the amount of cutting fluid to minimize machining cost and impact on environment.Recently, Minimum Quantity Lubrication (MQL) technique has been widely investigated as a good alternative to flood coolant.Although MQL improves machining results, its removal heat capability still needs to improve.In this paper, in order to enhance the thermal conductive and viscosity of MQL, nanoparticles were dispersed to make nanofluid coolant.Nanofluids have attracted the attention of investigators due to their good high thermal conductivity and ability to remove heat.In this study, the effect of the cutting speed, feed rate, and nanoparticle concentrations on machining titanium Ti-Al6-V4 alloy were investigated by performing ANOVA analysis.The nanofluid coolant was prepared by adding Aluminum Oxide (Al 2 O 3 ) nanoparticles to base fluid (vegetable oil) at different weight concentrations (0, 2, and 4%wt).The ANOVA analysis found that the nanoparticle concentrations and feed rate had a significant influence on surface roughness.The tool wear was also observed to be affected by nanoparticle concentration significantly.The nanoparticles concentration had a significant impact on the flank wear as it could improve the thermal conductivity and lubrication properties of the cutting fluid and reduce the coefficient of friction between the tool-workpiece and toolchip.In terms of the effect of nanoparticle concentrations, 4% wt provided better improvements in both surface roughness and tool wear compared to 2% wt concentration and the pure MQL.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProgress in Canadian Mechanical EngineeringSame topicAdvanced machining processes and optimizationFrench-language works237,207