‘You can see their minds grow’: identity development of LGBTQ youth at a residential wilderness camp
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
There is a substantial literature on the meaning of residential wilderness camps for youth and the benefits that they experience as a result of these camps. However, there is little work that details the experiences of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer (LGBTQ) youth at camps that are specifically designed for them and run by LGBTQ staff. Two focus groups were held at an LGBTQ camp and qualitative data analysis was undertaken. Results indicate support for the extant camp literature through positive identity development, experiences of social inclusion as well as support for cultivating positive attitudes toward physical activity. There was a lack of evidence to support increased spiritual connections and environmental awareness, possibly due to emphasizing programming around queer issues rather than intentionally programming nature-based activities and facilitating spiritual connections.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it