Global Value Chains and Product Differentiation: Changing the Politics of Trade
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Both global value chains and trade in differentiated goods have become increasingly important in the international economy. We argue that these two developments interact in changing the political economy of trade. For finished goods, product differentiation facilitates trade liberalization because the adjustment costs of liberalization are lower when countries trade varieties of the same good. By contrast, for goods that are used as inputs in the production process, product differentiation makes trade liberalization more difficult. We find support for this argument in two tests. On the one hand, we look at patterns of lobbying on US preferential trade agreements ( PTA s). On the other hand, we use a data set with highly disaggregated tariff data from 61 PTA s signed between 1995 and 2013. The paper contributes to the long‐standing debates on endogenous tariff formation and the consequences of intra‐industry trade, and a nascent literature on the relationship between global value chains and trade policy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it