Disordered Structures in Biology Can Provide Material Properties not Obtained with Precise Hierarchy
Why is this work in the frame?
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Full frame distilled prediction
Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
- Candidate categories
- Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
- Consensus categories
- none
- Domain
- Candidate signal: noneConsensus signal: none
- Study design
- Candidate signal: Bench or experimentalConsensus signal: Bench or experimental
- Genre
- Candidate signal: EmpiricalConsensus signal: Empirical
- Teacher disagreement score
- 0.004
- Threshold uncertainty score
- 0.997
- Validation status
machine_predicted_unvalidated·codex-gemma-dda1882f352a
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
- Teacher spread
- 0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
- Validation status
score_only:v0-immature-baseline· verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it
Abstract
Abstract Biological organisms exist in an astounding array of habitats. The materials produced by these organisms correspondingly exhibit significant diversity in function and form. Highly ordered and structured biological materials have been the subject of intense scientific investigation, especially in the context of exploring possible models for functional materials. Biological materials lacking in organized structure, on the other hand, such as barnacle exoskeletons, have largely been ignored. Here disordered biological materials falling into four different classes are discussed: soft and organic, hard and organic, soft and a composite of organic and inorganic, and hard and a composite of organic and inorganic. Across the examples within each class of materials one can see disorder at different length scales providing increases in fracture resistance or flexibility, suggesting disordered biological materials have much to teach us in terms of materials design.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
The record
- Venue
- Advanced Functional Materials
- Topic
- Calcium Carbonate Crystallization and Inhibition
- Field
- Materials Science
- Canadian institutions
- McGill University
- Funders
- Office of Naval Research
- Keywords
- Context (archaeology)Materials scienceBiological materialsBiological organismFlexibility (engineering)NanotechnologySoft materialsFunction (biology)Biochemical engineeringBiologyBiological systemEvolutionary biologyEngineeringMathematics
- Has abstract in OpenAlex
- yes