Adaptive Control and Optimization of Mobile Manipulation Subject to Input Saturation and Switching Constraints
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, a hierarchical hybrid motion/force control architecture for the manipulation and grasping of mobile manipulators is presented, where the systems are subject to varieties of physical constraints such as Coulomb friction cones, nonholonomic/holonomic constraints, and actuator saturation limits. The incorporation of a projection-based operation space control and an adaptive controller based on the neural networks used in this paper formulates a novel control scheme, so the system stability is further guaranteed and the uncertain dynamics is handled without redesigning the minimal-order dynamics model. Considering the effects of these constraints, the actuator saturation limits are handled by an auxiliary designed system, and the neural dynamics optimization is applied for the quadratically constrained programing problem of the optimal robotic grasping. The dynamic uncertainties can be estimated online by using the developed motion/force control strategy, and the application of a novel disturbance observer is explored to ensure the good tracking performance. The experimental results are presented to verify the performance and the efficiency of the proposed method.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it