MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Polymer Processing: Extrusion

2017· other· en· W2903690399 on OpenAlexaff
Chris Rauwendaal, Rubén González‐Núñez, Denis Rodrigue

Bibliographic record

VenueEncyclopedia of Polymer Science and Technology · 2017
Typeother
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicRheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExtrusionPlastics extrusionMixing (physics)Materials scienceMolding (decorative)Die (integrated circuit)Blow moldingExtrusion mouldingComposite materialMechanical engineeringRaw materialInjection molding machineMelting pointEngineeringMoldNanotechnologyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Extruders are the most common machines in the plastics processing industry. Extruders are used not only in extrusion operations but also in molding operations, for example, injection molding and blow molding. Essentially every plastic part has gone through an extruder at one point or another; in many cases, more than once. In typical plastics extrusion processing, a viscous melt under pressure is forced through a shaping die in a continuous stream. The feedstock may enter the extrusion device in the molten state, but more commonly it consists of solid particles that must be subjected in the extruder to melting, mixing, and pressurization. This article discusses extruders and the extrusion process in detail, including screw design, dies, mixing, melting, conveying, and degassing. It also includes a comparison between different configurations and reports on their advantages and limitations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.081

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0240.021

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEncyclopedia of Polymer Science and TechnologySame topicRheology and Fluid Dynamics StudiesFrench-language works237,207