Children's Spelling of English Inflectional Morphology
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Additional studies sine this initial exploratory work have replicated Read's (1975) and Beers and Henderson's (1977) findings. Studies have been conducted with Canadian French (Gill, 1979) and Spanish-speaking children (Temple, 1980) as well as with children in various regions in the states. Other studies have explored the influence of instruction and grade level (Beers, Beers, & Grant, 1977), dialect (Stever, 1980), and cognitive abilities (c. Beers, 1980; Zutell, 1980) on children's spelling of English vowels. A summary review of this research has led to several conclusions: (I) The spelling errors that children make as they write are not random errors; (2) There are indeed identifiable stages of orthographic awareness through which children pass as they become more proficient in their writing; and (3) Children proceed through these stages at varying rates.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.319 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it