Bleeding Simulation With Improved Visual Effects for Surgical Simulation Systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In surgical simulation, the Navier-Stokes (N-S) equation is commonly employed to imitate the physical characteristics of bleeding and the smooth particle hydrodynamics (SPHs) algorithm is applied to solve the numerical solution of the N-S equation. However, blood is viscous, incompressible and non-Newtonian fluid whose physical properties cannot be fully incorporated by the simple N-S equation, and the kernel approximation of the SPH algorithm may lead to both edge and volume distortions plus high computational cost. In this paper, both the tension force and the effect of platelets on the viscous force of bleeding particles are incorporated into the N-S equation in order to render more realistic visual effect and biological features of bleeding in surgical simulation. Constant core radius of the kernel function of the SPH algorithm is substituted with a function of particle density, avoiding potential edge distortions in simulating bleeding area. A repulsive force between particles is introduced, which effectively prevents volume distortions. Besides, accelerated search for particles based on the cube mesh improves the computational efficiency. The simulation results show that the presented simulation method leads to smooth bleeding surface and improves the visual effects of edge and volume in comparison with existing methods, and relatively high computational efficiency can be achieved as well.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".